technical evaluation reference group
TERG report to Global Fund Board highlights findings and recommendations of the 2020 prospective country evaluation and two thematic reviews
The Technical Evaluation Reference Group, or TERG, submitted its report to the Global Fund Board ahead of its 45th meeting on 11-12 May 2021.
The Global Fund is on track to maximize disease impact during this strategic period, says its strategic mid-term review
The Technical Evaluation Reference Group (TERG) of the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis (TB), and Malaria commissioned a mid-term review of its 2017-2022 strategy. The review found mixed progress towards the strategic objectives (SOs).
IMPLEMENTATION OF GLOBAL FUND’S SUSTAINABILITY, TRANSITION AND CO-FINANCING POLICY, IS ‘TRANSFORMATIVE’, SAYS THEMATIC REVIEW
The Technical Evaluation Reference Group (TERG), the Technical Review Panel (TRP), and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), three Global Fund bodies that are independent of the Secretariat, have recently evaluated and audited the Global Fund investments in building “Resilient and Sustainable Systems for Health” (RSSH), which make up 27% of all Global Fun
Global Fund’s Strategic Review 2017 identifies gaps in several program areas, including differentiated approaches, absorptive capacity and transitions
A report prepared in late 2017 – but not released until February 2019 – is the end product of a strategic review conducted by the Technical Evaluation Reference Group (TERG) on how well the Global Fund has been able, and will be able, to operationalize its strategic plans.
Global Fund’s technical evaluation group will focus on ‘prospective country evaluations’ and thematic reviews in 2019
The Technical Evaluation and Reference Group (TERG) of the Global Fund gave its report to the Board at the pre-Board meeting session held on November 13, 2018, at the new Global Health Campus in Geneva, Switzerland.
The Technical Evaluation Reference Group (TERG) is currently looking for multiple, senior, accomplished evaluators with significant relevant expertise and experience (at least 15–20 years) to replace out-going members.
Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) activists have been sounding the alarm for several years about what they perceive as systematic neglect of the region by the Global Fund. “We are the victims of our successes,” they say to highlight the fact that the Global Fund’s de-prioritization of the region is not a by-product of poor performance but rather a consequence of the current political climate.